-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Personally, I believe that ActiveMQ ought to be a TLP.
Just to be clear, though, that's just a personal opinion at this time, and in no way a 'dis is how t'ings is gonna be' statement. Right? :-) > What makes a project with multiple codebases an umbrella is a gray > area. I've posted *my* first-pass definition of the term: a TLP that has no deliverable packages of its own, only from its subprojects. There's no 'Apache Jakarta' package, so it's an umbrella. There *is* an 'Apache HTTP Server' package, so that isn't. Subject to exceptions, clarifications, and further refinements, of course, but that's my working definition. - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRBf065rNPMCpn3XdAQKD9wQA3KqhUOsk9WG2OAvFyGmZF+e9mbQTq9O/ aXOa4qVFWfNns/rc2NpPwO6jewSepneo+uVKMBk/5MCjczuwFZSmq9uMyE9LJ/Na czsKVChEYYrHJnrDoKXoQqmaIxnDLBtYU/SEHggzWH8L9RuryFUXPV5/HGSCSLKu EvPHDljpWJU= =dSia -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
