On Mar 26, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:

Hi David,

I've started to update my geronimo 1.1 working copy to use amq 4.

Are you sure you mean g 1.1? That is the still broken branch only Dain and I have been working on. g trunk is 1.2 now.
If
your interested in helping port it over, then yeah I think a branch
would be a good idea.

What should the branch name be?

Well, we called the g. branch configid for a while, then changed it to 1.1 So I think either G_1.1 or configId would be reasonable.

We might only need to branch the gbeans rather than all of AMQ, what do you think?


thanks
david jencks



Regards,
Hiram

On 3/26/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geronimo 1.1 needs some changes in the activemq gbeans in order for
activemq to be able to start and be managed by the console.  Which
version(s) should I make the modifications in?  Should I make an AMQ
branch for this?

The problems I've identified so far are:

- The management helper gbean needs extensive modifications to use
AbstractNames rather than ObjectNames.

- The JDBCPersistenceAdapterGBean uses an AMQ interface in its
reference to dataSource: this no longer works as we now check that a
target gbean declares the interface you ask for in a reference.

Thanks
david jencks




--
Regards,
Hiram

Reply via email to