svn is still down... Thanks Anita
--- Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, please, upload your code. > I will try to update them for 1.1. > > Thanks, > Guillaume Nodet > > anita kulshreshtha wrote: > > >Comments inline.. > > > >--- Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>Plugins are quite independant of the build afaik (even if they are > >>used > >>by the main build). > >>They could be written for G 1.1 and updated for G 1.x and have > their > >>lifecycle decorrelated from Geronimo. > >> > >> > > Usually they are and will be in the future... The change from > HEAD > >to 1.1 is so drastic that there was no point in continuing the > >development of packaging and other plugins in the HEAD. > > > > > >>As they will be very useful for people creating plugins, I think it > > >>could be interesting to write them for 1.1 before of the m2 switch. > >>Is there any beginning of implementation available somewhere ? > >> > >> > > I have some code for packaging plugin for 1.1 that compiles but > you > >would need M2 geronimo-* jars for that. There is no point using the > >HEAD for anything now. Please let me know if you want me upload a > patch > >to the jira. > > > >Thanks > >Anita > > > > > >>Cheers, > >>Guillaume Nodet > >> > >> > >>anita kulshreshtha wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> All work related to M2 was halted until the trunk was merged. > M2 > >>>packaging plugin would require transferring all M2 work to 1.1. I > do > >>>not think there are any plans to do it before the merge or at > least > >>> > >>> > >>the > >> > >> > >>>1.1. release. I think using Maven1 will be best at this time. > Let's > >>>hear from Jacek.. > >>> > >>>Thanks > >>>Anita > >>> > >>>--- Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>I haven't seen any geronimo plugin for m2 in head. > >>>>That whould be very usefull, especially because Geronimo plugins > >>>> > >>>> > >>have > >> > >> > >>>>to > >>>>be in a m2 layout, but the only tools to create a car is a m1 > >>>> > >>>> > >>plugin. > >> > >> > >>>>Any idea ? > >>>> > >>>>Cheers, > >>>>Guillaume Nodet > >>>> > >>>>Aaron Mulder wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>I'd rather handle the ApacheDS integration separately from the > 1.1 > >>>>>release. Fortunately, the plugins work with the Maven 2 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>repository, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>so that issue should be easier. > >>>>> > >>>>>The main question is how to do the build and packaging. If the > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>API > >> > >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>is > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>unchanged, we can build our integration module using our Maven 1 > >>>>>packaging plugin against ADS 0.9.2 and just have it apply the > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>1.0.x > >> > >> > >>>>>JARs at installation time. If the API is different, it may make > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>the > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>most sense to try to split out our directory integration and do > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>the > >> > >> > >>>>>build and packaging under Maven 2 (I'm assuming that Geronimo > HEAD > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>has > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>a Maven 2 packaging plugin, but if not, I guess we can work on > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>one). > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Thanks, > >>>>> Aaron > >>>>> > >>>>>On 5/10/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>ApacheDS 0.9.2 to 1.0-RC2 ? > >>>>>>I have a patch to port the Geronimo part to 1.0-RC2. However, > >>>>>>currently ADS 1.0 jars propagated to maven2 repo only. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>2006/5/9, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Consolidated list so far is: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Axis from 1.4-356167 to 1.4 > >>>>>>>commons-fileupload 1.1-dev to 1.1 > >>>>>>>jasper from 5.5.9 to 5.5.15 > >>>>>>>Jetty from 5.1.9 to 5.1.10 > >>>>>>>stax from 1.1.1-dev to 1.1.2 > >>>>>>>Tomcat 5.5.9 to 5.5.15 > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
