Aaron, sounds like we have the appropriate +1s. do you have a date when this will be done ?
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Currently, the code checked in to the geronimo/site repo does not (and should not) correspond to our live web site. My understanding is that Hernan has a newer revision that he has not checked in (but it can be seen at http://people.apache.org/~hcunico/newsite/) I want to update the news and events on the current site to move the expired events, add some 1.1 information, etc. I want to do that to the site as it exists on geronimo.apache.org site today, until we're in agreement about what it should look like next. Currently I can't do that unless I edit the HTML on minotaur directly and lose any Subversion history (I believe the content on minotaur is as of just-before-rev-411192). I propose we: - move geronimo/site to geronimo/site/branches/may2006 - copy geronimo/site revision 411191 to geronimo/site/trunk - update the site sync script on minotaur to pull from geronimo/site/trunk Then Hernan can check his pending changes into the new branch and I can check my news and event updates into both the branch and trunk and sync minotaur from trunk. When we're all agreed that the branch content is what we want, we can either merge it to trunk or move trunk away and move the branch to be the new trunk. I'm taking the slightly unusual step of not attaching a patch since I think the description above is much more meaningful than the equivalent tremendously large patch. Here's my +1, can I get 3 more? Thanks, Aaron