Excellent! I'm breathing a sigh of relief :) -----Original Message----- From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 8:55 AM To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: STOMP and JMSType
On 6/14/06, Mittler, Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For map messages, on the c++ side of things we would essentially have to > write a schema file for the layout of a map message. The c++ stomp > client would have to be coded against that schema to properly parse the > message. Unfortunately, we don't have the luxury of using a tool like > XStream that uses reflection ... makes you wonder why people still code > in c++! =) ;) A stomp client could just expose the XML as text; then the client application can process it however it wants - as plain text or do regex on it or use some xml parser of its choosing etc. My rambling about XStream was really focussed on the Stomp transport inside the ActiveMQ broker - i.e. the stomp <-> JMS bridge - rather than the clients. I'd not want to force all Stomp clients to support some kinda XStream feature. I like the rule that telnet has to be a compliant Stomp cilent :) - James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/