-rajith
On 6/29/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The link to the paper people are talking about out is here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC10/clustering.html
-dain
On Jun 29, 2006, at 9:41 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Hopefully this is early enough for someone to look at.
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Caching
>
> It need lots more detail - I have some graphics too but don't have
> time to write them up before meeting so I'll try to get that done
> this afternoon and update the wiki page.
>
> I'll be a bit late but I'll be there.
>
> Looking forward to it.
>
> TTFN,
>
> -bd-
>
> On Jun 29, 2006, at 8:00 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
>>
>> Jeff,
>>
>> this suggestion is probably too late....
>>
>> but given the deficiencies of dialin, would it be possible for you
>> to post a short
>> summary of where your work with clustering is at?
>>
>> Is there a page on the(a?) wiki about the approach you are taking?
>> I can see the tomcat clustering page
>>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/clustering.html
>>
>> and the overview page
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC10/clustering.html
>>
>> but nothing on kluster or the session API
>>
>> cheers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeff Genender wrote:>
>>> Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>>> Guys,
>>>>
>>>> Covalent had to commit to a time - we went for 6:00pm on thursday.
>>>>
>>>> I realise that this may be a little earlier than some of you
>>>> were hoping
>>>> for, but it was the best we could do at short notice - sorry.
>>>>
>>>> One further problem. We were not able to organise conferencing
>>>> facilities. If anyone thinks that they can work around this,
>>>> perhaps via
>>>> skype or something, I would be happy to try to set something up
>>>> - Has
>>>> anyone run a skype conference with 4 or 5 participants before ?
>>>> Would
>>>> you like us to try?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, thats ok...thanks for giving a shot.
>>>
>>> I would ask that we bring as much to the lists afterwards as
>>> there are
>>> others who have/are doing considerable work in the clustering
>>> area and
>>> are not able to be there. It would be nice to be engaged in
>>> discussions. Thanks again for trying.
>>>
>>>> Jules
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was planning on attending the CeltiXFire BOF at 2100 Dublin
>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>> 2200 is good from my perspective.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a little later than I was hoping for - my worry would
>>>>>> be that
>>>>>> people who might otherwise be there will have packed up and
>>>>>> gone home
>>>>>> by then.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would rather a slot somewhere between 6:00pm and 9:00pm...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How does that sound ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jules
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Evening you time would be best for me. It looks like there
>>>>>>>> is an 8
>>>>>>>> hour time diff between Dublin and California, so anything
>>>>>>>> after 6pm
>>>>>>>> your time would be good for me (10am here). I can go maybe
>>>>>>>> an hour
>>>>>>>> earlier, but then I will be sleepy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -dain
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jun 27, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jeff Genender wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you going to provide a call in line so people not at
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> conference can participate?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'll look into it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Would anyone be interested in using such a feature ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would likely be interested too depending on time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> OK, Jeff - so are there any windows on thurs aft/eve
>>>>>>>>> (dublin time)
>>>>>>>>> which would not suit you ? Let us know, so that we can
>>>>>>>>> avoid them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jules
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Jules
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -dain
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt - I don't think that the problem was with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsorship,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but rather
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclusion... (maybe I've misunderstood something?).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Covalent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are simply
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing a room and beer. The invitation is open to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the entire
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community and you will be driving the meeting.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That should be cool. Firstly, it has been announced here
>>>>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>>>> public list. Secondly, you should consider putting up a few
>>>>>>>>>>> notice signs around ApacheCon to catch interested people who
>>>>>>>>>>> didn't see this.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, exclusion and lack of openness was the issue. The
>>>>>>>>>>> sponsorship
>>>>>>>>>>> was mud in the water. By mentioning this here the issue is
>>>>>>>>>>> rendered
>>>>>>>>>>> nonexistent.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, you need to post (here and on those paper
>>>>>>>>>>> notices) the
>>>>>>>>>>> details, such as time and place, as soon as they're
>>>>>>>>>>> figured out.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Jules. And thanks for raising this, Matt, so it
>>>>>>>>>>> can be
>>>>>>>>>>> clarified a bit.
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> #ken P-)}
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
>>>>>>>>>>> Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --"Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a
>>>>>>>>> piece of
>>>>>>>>> string into a super-saturated solution and a whole
>>>>>>>>> operating-system
>>>>>>>>> crystallises out around it."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /**********************************
>>>>>>>>> * Jules Gosnell
>>>>>>>>> * Partner
>>>>>>>>> * Core Developers Network (Europe)
>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>> * www.coredevelopers.net
>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>> * Open Source Training & Support.
>>>>>>>>> **********************************/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>
