Its probably important to note that if the TCK passes against an m1
build of 1.2, that does not mean that it will also pass against an m2
build.
So, I don't see any reason to keep m1 around anymore.
* * *
Kevan, what needs to be done to get the TCK runnable against the m2
build of 1.2?
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
It definitely impacts aspects of TCK. Agreed that it's important
that we hear from the people who are going to get those aspects of
the TCK working... ;-)
At this point, I don't see any harm in dropping m1. It's not going
to add any additional work and will drive our adoption of m2...
--kevan
On Aug 7, 2006, at 11:26 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I am all for dropping the m1 build too...
But I think the people who run the TCK should speak up first as
this may
impact them significantly...
Jeff
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I propose we remove the m1 build. It has been broken for
several days
now and no one has noticed. Here is my vote:
+1 to remove the m1 build
-dain
+1
Regards,
Alan
