There's a ring of truth in these paragraphs.
Regards,
Alan
Jason Dillon wrote:
For the record, I do think that it is a good idea to split G up into
some smaller chunks... I am just concerned about how small the chunks
become and how it may eventually lead to chaos.... I've been there
before and would like to avoid it in the future.
I am not against moving transaction and connector bits to separate
peer trees... I am just trying to avoid us moving all modules to
separate trees which would be a massive painful nightmare. But, I
think that splitting off large/major chunks of G into versioned trees
is the right direction... just need to make sure it does not get out
of hand.
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006, at 6:42 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
What do everyone think about changing the transaction and connector
modules to be versioned independently of the main Geronimo server?
-dain
