On Aug 15, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
+1 to Jason's original proposal
I agree
david jencks
-dain
On Aug 15, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I have not read anything to that affect... and would not recommend
doing that. Top-level directories with the standard svn trunk,
tags and branches is what I think will work out best for the long
run.
--jason
On Aug 15, 2006, at 3:07 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Sounds OK to me, though I thought there had been some talk about
something more like
trunk/server
trunk/other
trunk/another
server/branches
server/tags
other/branches
other/tags
another/branches
another/tags
Or something like that -- where all the trunks were together but all
the branches and tags were separate. Or am I making that up?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/15/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches to
server/*. This will make the top-level of our repository more
consistent.
Specifically, I think we should:
svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server
svn mv https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/tags https://
svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags
svn mv https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/trunk https://
svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk
svn mv https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/branches https://
svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches
And then update the pom's in server/trunk to reflect the new
location
for scm tags.
--jason
