Tried the new bootstrap.bat with the bootstrap.xml. Failed as follows -
clean: [delete] Deleting directory C:\Apache\geronimo\trunk2\thirdparty BUILD FAILED C:\Apache\geronimo\trunk2\bootstrap.xml:73: Execute failed: java.io.IOException: CreateProcess: mvn clean error=2 Trying again.. Cheers Prasad On 8/22/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aight, its out... give it a whirl and let me know if you run into anything. --jason On Aug 22, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > Sounds good...thanks for taking this approach. > > Jason Dillon wrote: >> I mentioned before, that if we use antrun here, that it will cause >> other >> antrun executions to fail since plugins are only initialized once, >> and >> some plugins need to add some additional dependencies. >> >> Its also much more difficult to support executions of individual >> steps >> using antrun. >> >> Best bet is to use something external... before it was /bin/sh... and >> now its gonna be Ant. I think that is better that /bin/sh and batch. >> >> --jason >> >> >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 6:16 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: >> >>> Jason, >>> >>> Why not use the ant-run plugin for maven instead of a build.xml? >>> >>> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-antrun-plugin/ >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> >>> >>> Jason Dillon wrote: >>>> I've whipped up an equivalent bootstrap.xml, testing it now... >>>> >>>> if it works as expected I will commit it, and a bootstrap and >>>> bootstrap.bat that will invoke the build. >>>> >>>> Then, everyone needs to have Ant 1.6.5 installed (and ant >>>> available on >>>> the PATH) and Cygwin is no longer required. >>>> >>>> --jason >>>> >>>> >>>> On Aug 22, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jacek Laskowski wrote: >>>>>> On 8/22/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>> I meant to just use Ant... if we end up using antrun from the >>>>>>> bootstrap it will end up causing other antrun's to fail later on >>>>>>> since some of them need additional dependencies... which >>>>>>> won't work. >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, didn't think about it. Are you really suggesting to use >>>>>> Ant beside >>>>>> Maven? It's getting too complicated to just get started. When >>>>>> do you >>>>>> think bootstrap will go away? Is it worth to talk about it any >>>>>> more? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacek >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I hope this is not taken negatively...as it is not meant that >>>>> way... >>>>> >>>>> I think it is worth talking about, especially when we think >>>>> bootstrap >>>>> will go away. I respect Jason's disdain for Windows, but it >>>>> also is >>>>> the >>>>> most used and most popular OS...which means it probably >>>>> represents a >>>>> large base of our community. :) >>>>> >>>>> IMHO, if we are to continue with the bootstrap, then I think it is >>>>> reasonable to support both *nix and Windows. No...I am not >>>>> volunteering >>>>> as I have other things on my plate, but I think if Mark D. >>>>> wants to >>>>> take >>>>> on supporting the Windows side, I cannot find a negative in this. >>>>> What I >>>>> do not think is reasonable is forcing any user to have to install >>>>> Cygwin >>>>> (even though I love it) to build G on Windows. Cygwin is a fairly >>>>> large >>>>> install and I have been at companies where one is forbidden to >>>>> have it >>>>> on corporate machines. >>>>> >>>>> So, my point is, if the bootstrap is short lived, then >>>>> disregard my >>>>> opinion ;-) But if it's gonna be with us for a while, lets >>>>> allow the >>>>> Windows bat version if Mark is willing to support it...or find >>>>> something >>>>> (like ant?) that will make it work on our most popular OS >>>>> systems. >>>>> >>>>> Jeff
