-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Blevins wrote: > > But the lazy consensus "cut off" you mention is something to think > about.
That sort of model has been used before successfully. IIRC, it was as part of the 'controversial issues are RTC' part of CTR. In other words, rather than committing something that might be controversial (which shouldn't be done under pretty much any circumstances), it would be posted as a patch for people to examine and check out, with a comment of 'if no-one - -1s this in 72 hours I'll commit it.' An acceptable middle ground procedure. - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBROx7uZrNPMCpn3XdAQITDQQA3oq9WMLV5MFANtDEdpW3RdQcKS4byz7M ibu2l6vhRdyhvLGKQwUnQBmPzzvnG+WAMQrCyxI3nNZAMbeQ2R2vqpUL/5ODULdn 7SYBf2iFBuS9+ouodGjTccCv3zGTPa130VZwVusvAdn36Qk+5FjF1SO0J7jG8FBA Z3hW59qp1wI= =Xlj6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
