JBohn pointed out I had RTC as my last statement...I meant CTR
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
From a purely discussion perspective I'm in favor of a change. I'm not
sure a total shift to CTR is appropriate but I'm not particularly
opposed to it either. I don't think the development model itself is the
issue. The major issue that we've been dealing with is the community
dynamics and alignment of people's interests and Apache's community
model (or lack of alignment).
I would expect that if we were to move to CTR we'd see a continuation of
what we're doing now with the exception that all changes would not
require the current voting requirements. I plan on reviewing the
commits as they go in (as Jason alluded to in another thread). I think
we all are expecting more things to be documented via JIRA for improved
documentation and communication. That major items are announced as
their inspired so the community can provide feedback in the form of
comments or assistance. We all assume comments are constructive and
spend a few minutes thinking about an e-mail before sending it (boy and
I guilty of violating this one:)
Overall, I'm in favor of changing. Part of me would like to simply go
to RTC and let the community dynamics prove themselves. Definitely not
a return to the previous model though.
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Apache Geronimo has been operating mostly under the
Review-Then-Commit model for a couple of months now,
and I think the issues the change was intended to
highlight have been .. well, highlighted.
How do people feel about the idea of switching back
to Commit-Then-Review at this point?
