Good question. What is genesis? Did I miss an RTC vote?
Regards,
Alan
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Does xbean need genesis?
-dain
On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Do we really want xbean dependent on genesis? Seems like it's not
working out too well.
-David
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Guillaume Nodet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: August 23, 2006 1:44:02 PM PDT
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
I would totally agree with you if maven allows you to release
something which
is dependant on a snapshot (even a plugin). Which unfortunately is
not the case ...
Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice, because i'd
like to
ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on genesis)
The xbean release is needed to release the jencks project which has
been
updated to G 1.1, and which is a dependency of ServiceMix.
ServiceMix also
depends on the snapshot car-plugin for G.
... and I was hoping i would be able to ask for a ServiceMix release
in a few
weeks ...
Seriously, i can put it anywhere you want, but i really need a released
version asap, and not have to wait 3 or 4 months until 1.1.2 is
shipped.
Well, i always have the possibility to build it and deploy it in
ServiceMix
private repo under a timestamped version (but not a snapshots).
But I'm sure i'm not the only one in this case and I'd rather do it
the right way.
On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think we just
add it to 1.1, leave it as a snapshot plugin for the
moment, and then release it when 1.1.2 rolls out.
--jason
On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> -1 on adding it to 1.1.1. Put it in 1.1.2. 1.1.1 has been
> delayed for a few weeks for minor changes.
>
> Jason Dillon wrote:
>> On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done
>>> right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2.
>>>
>>> It's done and it works for my plugins. That does not mean there
>>> is no bugs.
>> Mkay... so lets add it to branches/1.1, merge to 1.1.1 and include
>> it in the release.
>>> But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that addition of the
>>> plugin.
>>>
>>> Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server, just to
>>> include a plugin,
>>> which would btw not be included in the distribution itself ?
>> I'm not gonna volunteer to do any m1 related stuff :-P m2 stuff
>> is killing me asis... :-\
>> --jason
--Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
