No, there was not. Jason, what' s the added value of genesis for xbean right now ? If it prevent us to release, can we wait a bit or revert ?
I think Jason did that to use the geronimo css for xbean maven site. On 8/24/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good question. What is genesis? Did I miss an RTC vote? Regards, Alan Dain Sundstrom wrote: > Does xbean need genesis? > > -dain > > On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:18 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >> Do we really want xbean dependent on genesis? Seems like it's not >> working out too well. >> >> -David >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: "Guillaume Nodet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Date: August 23, 2006 1:44:02 PM PDT >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1 >>> Reply-To: [email protected] >>> >>> I would totally agree with you if maven allows you to release >>> something which >>> is dependant on a snapshot (even a plugin). Which unfortunately is >>> not the case ... >>> >>> Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice, because i'd >>> like to >>> ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on genesis) >>> The xbean release is needed to release the jencks project which has >>> been >>> updated to G 1.1, and which is a dependency of ServiceMix. >>> ServiceMix also >>> depends on the snapshot car-plugin for G. >>> ... and I was hoping i would be able to ask for a ServiceMix release >>> in a few >>> weeks ... >>> >>> Seriously, i can put it anywhere you want, but i really need a released >>> version asap, and not have to wait 3 or 4 months until 1.1.2 is >>> shipped. >>> >>> Well, i always have the possibility to build it and deploy it in >>> ServiceMix >>> private repo under a timestamped version (but not a snapshots). >>> But I'm sure i'm not the only one in this case and I'd rather do it >>> the right way. >>> >>> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think we just >>> add it to 1.1, leave it as a snapshot plugin for the >>> moment, and then release it when 1.1.2 rolls out. >>> >>> --jason >>> >>> >>> On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: >>> >>> > -1 on adding it to 1.1.1. Put it in 1.1.2. 1.1.1 has been >>> > delayed for a few weeks for minor changes. >>> > >>> > Jason Dillon wrote: >>> >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done >>> >>> right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2. >>> >>> >>> >>> It's done and it works for my plugins. That does not mean there >>> >>> is no bugs. >>> >> Mkay... so lets add it to branches/1.1, merge to 1.1.1 and include >>> >> it in the release. >>> >>> But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that addition of the >>> >>> plugin. >>> >>> >>> >>> Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server, just to >>> >>> include a plugin, >>> >>> which would btw not be included in the distribution itself ? >>> >> I'm not gonna volunteer to do any m1 related stuff :-P m2 stuff >>> >> is killing me asis... :-\ >>> >> --jason >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --Cheers, >>> Guillaume Nodet >
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet
