I was planning on some changes to TranQL for CMP support but didn't get them completed on time. I
thought it would be unfair to hold up the release because of my delinquency so I regressed to 1.3.
The changes should be in 1.1.2 or 1.2.
Udovichenko, Nellya wrote:
Hello, Matt!
I have downloaded Geronimo-1.1.1-rc2 and see TranQL version is 1.3 there instead of 1.3.1
I expected.
Kevan Miller wrote that's due to there haven't been any changes to TranQL since 1.3
(see topic "TranQL version in Geronimo-1.1.1-rc1" yesterday).
Does it mean the support for transaction isolation level setting would only be
available in TranQL 1.4?
Nellya.
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:41 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Transaction isolation level in TranQL
Vasily,
It is already part of TranQL. What we need is a change to OpenEJB to allow the specification of
Isolation Level so TranQL can generate the right code. Let me start a new thread to see if we can
get this in 1.1.1.
Matt
Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hi, Matt,
What are the perspectives of having the capability to specify the
transaction isolation level in TranQL?
I'm awaiting this feature eagerly, as it looks like a key to a
successful SPECjAppServer2004 run...
Recently you said
(http://www.mail-archive.com/user@geronimo.apache.org/msg03421.html
<http://www.mail-archive.com/user@geronimo.apache.org/msg03421.html> )
that this feature may be a part of TranQL 1.3.1, which is gonna be a
part of Geronimo 1.1.1, as far as I understand. Am I right?
Thank you!
Vasily Zakharov
Intel Middleware Products Division
