Hernan Cunico wrote:
We already have some "structure" for monitoring (or better trying to
monitor) the project development status
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Development+Status
Any ideas how we could reuse this info/templates?
Would it be better to have the "Apache Geronimo Development Status"
moved under "Apache Geronimo Development"?
What would help us to stay on track
I agree it would be helpful to track progress using the report card and
package tracking wiki pages from the link above, possibly updated with
links to the appropriate JIRAs.
John
Cheers!
Hernan
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 9/7/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm a big believer that 1.3 will have a ton of nice features! If you
release it, users will use it :) I don't think we need to feature
pack every release.
It seems to me we spent a bunch of time feature packing a 1.1.x
release. If we would do that to trunk instead, our 1.n releases would
be more impressive.
Agreed - forward progress and a visible roadmap are what users want to
see. Right now Geronimo is headed pretty squarely down the path of
updates every six months. IMO, we need to change that and feature
packing every release is only going to keep things on that track.
Bruce
