Actually, what I'd really like to see is our console allow app
developers to plugin their own portlets for custom administration of
their applications which are running in Geronimo...
--jason
On Mar 2, 2007, at 11:27 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Or... what about Jetspeed 2? Again I know jack about all things
portal so I have no idea... but I would like to have the console
get to be more pluggable and dynamic to install plugin bits at
runtime.
--jason
On Mar 2, 2007, at 10:52 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 5:49 PM, David Jencks wrote:
It's used by pluto for the admin console. No idea if more recent
would work.
We could upgrade pluto too if anyone has some time to investigate
I wonder if anyone from the Pluto team would want to help with
that... looks like 1.1 is not compatible with 1.0.1... but also
looks like that might not be a bad thing:
<snip>
Pluto 1.1 introduces a new container architecture. If you are
embedding Pluto in your portal, realize that 1.1 is not binarily
compatible with Pluto 1.0.x.
Pluto 1.1 aims to simplify the architecture in order to make it
more user and developer friendly. You should find Pluto 1.1 easier
to get started with, easier to understand, and easier to embed
with your portal. Your feedback regarding how far we've come is
always welcome on the user and developer mailing lists!
</snip>
I don't know much abort portal muck, so I can't really show how
much better 1.1 might be... but I know that there have been some
issues with the console asis now to get stuff like plugin porlets
installed dynamically... perhaps 1.1 can help solve some of these
issues?
Anyone know?
--jason
