I am excited ;-) with the opportunity that is opening up for my new portlet to get included in G2.0.
I will see if I can wrap up auto-handling of security configuration for web-apps by Monday. - Shiva On 7/27/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sounds good! A tech preview with all these new goodies would be great, it > will definitively drag users' attention, and if we hook them to their own > wiki pages it would be even greater. > > Depending on the number of portlets we have (or may have) we may actually > want to create a separate Tech Preview space in Confluence. > > Do we have a rough idea how many would fall into this bag? > > Cheers! > Hernan > > Prasad Kashyap wrote: > > I kinda like the idea. Each such portlet should have a link to it's > > own wiki page which will allow user feedback. > > > > I wonder if we can even take it one further, by having a wiki page for > > some of our existing heavy-weight portlets (eg. wizards). The user can > > blog their feedbacks which do not necessarily fall under the scope of > > a JIRA. The wiki can be made to send comments to the dev-list > > automatically. > > > > Currently we do not have a closed loop for our users to provide > > feedbacks. Feedbacks provided on the lists are usually lost. > > > > This will improve the usability of our console. > > > > Cheers > > Prasad > > > > On 7/26/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> How about adding a "Tech Preview" portlet group in Admin Console in G > 2.0 > >> where we can include the portlets (for e.g., the "Create Plan" portlet > >> Shiva > >> is working on. See > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3254) for > >> which user feedback will play a great role in improving those > >> further. Once > >> we decide on whether to retain those or not, we can either move them > >> out to > >> a different group or remove them from Admin Console accordingly. > >> > >> Vamsi > >> > > >
