I would say the opposite. The OSGi classloaders are much more powerful and you can more easily control the visibility of classes. In addition, if JCL is required by a given bundle A, it does not mean that it will be visible by a bundle using bundle A.
Obviously, this means to be tested (or maybe OSGi experts could help there...) Cheers, Guillaume Nodet On Aug 27, 2007, at 9:29 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
Also, moving toward an architecture based on OSGi almost guarantees that we will run into classloader issues with JCL. Bruce
