I agree 2.0.2 should be primarily bug fixes but I don't think it must be
limited to only bug fixes. If there are small changes that address
customer concerns on security (such as GERONIMO-2925) or usability then
I think those can be considered for inclusion. Key is to keep the date
Kevan proposed (Friday, 9/21) and resolve any TCK issues.
Joe
David Jencks wrote:
I'm starting to wonder what the goal for 2.0.2 is. I kinda thought that
a x.y.z where z > 0 was a bugfix-only release of x.y.z-1 but I think
some new features are going into 2.0.2... IIUC Vamsi is applying an
enhancement to allow specifying work directory per-web-app and donald is
encouraging me to apply my proposal to GERONIMO-2925 to the branch.
Though small these are definitely new features.
Personally I would prefer to minimize such feature creep and have more
focus on getting 2.1 out in a less than geological time frame, in
particular before apachecon atlanta.
What do others think?
thanks
david jencks
