After thinking about this some more I upgraded the MyFaces version to
1.2.1-SNAPSHOT in server/trunk but not in the 2.0 branch. If trunk
is passing all JSF tests in time for 2.0.2 then I will upgrade there
as well.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Sep 17, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On Sep 17, 2007, at 1:49 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Paul McMahan wrote:
Joe, you mentioned TCK and our ability to make 2.0.2 available by
9/21. I have a question for the team about that. I would like
to bump Geronimo's version of MyFaces from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 since
that new release contains several bug fixes, some of them
actually found and reported by Geronimo users. But doing that
could affect Geronimo's TCK results and affect the 9/21 delivery
date. I would imagine that the same is true for other
dependencies. Are we OK with picking up maintenance releases
of Geronimo dependencies in 2.0.2 even if we think TCK issues
could slow us down? Or should we keep 2.0.2 focused on
"localized" changes and only bump the dependency versions in
Geronimo 2.1 so we have more time to deal any resulting TCK issues?
I think it makes sense to move to the latest version of the
Geronimo dependencies. However, it probably makes sense to
validate areas in the TCK that may be impacted prior to the change
or soon there-after in case there are issues that need to be
resolve which might impact our ability to deliver in a timely manner.
OK thanks Joe (and Kevan). Just wanted to make sure that overall
as a team we agree that it's OK to introduce changes that could
affect the proposed 9/21 date due to TCK issues. We can always
back those changes out if we decide to, of course.
Best wishes,
Paul