On 10/3/07, Ted Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool! I wrote a (cough, cough) perl script to generate wiki markup > for a table from the data in the configs/*/pom.xml files, and updated > the wiki page with it. I then produced a merged table to compare > existing pom descriptions to the ones I had entered. I'd like to get > further input, store updated descriptions in the pom.xml description > element, and then I think it makes sense to generate a page from the > pom.xml data. There appear to be two attributes for each that would > be nice to capture in doc: whether the module is initially started, > and whether it should *never* be started. I wonder if any sort of > attribute could be added for capturing this in pom.xml?
IIUC, are you wondering if we should add attributes in the pom.xml that will say whether this configuration is initially started or should never be started ? Other than for updating the wiki, will this attribute be useful for anything else ? Cheers Prasad > > Ted Kirby > > On 10/2/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nice! > > > > In trunk, the <description> element in the config's pom gets put into > > the geronimo-plugin.xml description so it really needs to be > > accurate. It would be great if we could generate future versions of > > this page from the plugin catalog. Meanwhile it might be worthwhile > > comparing the descriptions here with the descriptions in the trunk > > configs' poms to make sure they are consistent and the most > > informative wins :-) > > > > thanks! > > david jencks > > > > On Oct 2, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Ted Kirby wrote: > > > > > I have added this wiki page > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/system-modules.html to list the > > > modules that come with the (2.0.1) server, along with: > > > > > > 1. A brief description of what the module does > > > 2. Is it started by default, or > > > 3. Should it never be started? > > > > > > This is a first draft. I solicit feedback and encourage folks to > > > update the page as appropriate. There are some modules with which I > > > am not familiar. > > > > > > Ted Kirby > > > > >
