On 10/9/07, Andrea Zoppello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guillaume, > > If you take a look at the document "How to cook your spagic" you could > find all the information, on the patches, enhnacements that we've made > on servicemix. > > Actually spagic is based on smx 3.1.1 codebase. > > By the way our approach is to keep the patches that we've done in spagic > until they're > taken bu smx codebase.
Most of the bug you are talking about have been already fixed afaik (SM-781, SM-924, SM-879). One is still pending in an unknown state (SM-888). You have raised another one recently about the split aggregator which has been included too (not released yet). But I agree some have not been relesed yet :-( > > In future versions of spagic the patches that we've update to JIRA will > not be there > anymore, because it will be included directly in smx :-) Cool, I think that's the way to go too. Hopefully we will be able to have shorter release cycles now. > > By the way have you seen my post about the needing for "Merge > components" in front > of a Drools or Content Based router?? > > > Andrea Zoppello > > Guillaume Nodet ha scritto: > > Andrea, I've just downloaded the source zip of the components and it > > seems that there is lots of components coming from ServiceMix: are > > these differents in some sort ? Bug fixes, enhancements ? If so what > > about raising JIRAs and attaching your patches ? I know you have > > already done so and iirc i have applied them ... > > > > On 10/9/07, Andrea Zoppello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Bruce, > >> > >> You can take a look at: > >> > >> http://forge.objectweb.org/projects/spagic > >> > >> In the project site you could find the source code. > >> > >> By the way some information the spagic TCP component is based on apache > >> mina. > >> > >> > >> Andrea Zoppello > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Bruce Snyder ha scritto: > >> > >>> On 10/8/07, jpuro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Yup, that makes sense. But after looking at spagic it seems that they > >>>> already use mina in a similar fashion and handle a lot of other > >>>> requirements > >>>> for tcp/ip etc. Take a look at their source code and let me know what > >>>> you > >>>> think. Otherwise I'll just implement my own version on apache mina as I > >>>> have seen camel-mina do. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Please provide a URL to the source of the code you're looking at. > >>> > >>> Bruce > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
