AFAIK, the one provided by Spagic is LGPL and unless they plan to change its license we can't really use it in ServiceMix. So there are 3 possibilities: * you don't care about LGPL, so just use it * the component is relicensed under AL * the component is contributed to ServiceMix (which implies it is relicensed) * or you start a new one :-(
On 10/9/07, jpuro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, what to do about a TCP component? :) > > -jeff > > > gnodet wrote: > > > > On 10/9/07, Andrea Zoppello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi Guillaume, > >> > >> If you take a look at the document "How to cook your spagic" you could > >> find all the information, on the patches, enhnacements that we've made > >> on servicemix. > >> > >> Actually spagic is based on smx 3.1.1 codebase. > >> > >> By the way our approach is to keep the patches that we've done in spagic > >> until they're > >> taken bu smx codebase. > > > > Most of the bug you are talking about have been already fixed afaik > > (SM-781, SM-924, SM-879). One is still pending in an unknown state > > (SM-888). You have raised another one recently about the split > > aggregator which has been included too (not released yet). But I > > agree some have not been relesed yet :-( > > > >> > >> In future versions of spagic the patches that we've update to JIRA will > >> not be there > >> anymore, because it will be included directly in smx :-) > > > > Cool, I think that's the way to go too. Hopefully we will be able to > > have shorter release cycles now. > > > >> > >> By the way have you seen my post about the needing for "Merge > >> components" in front > >> of a Drools or Content Based router?? > >> > >> > >> Andrea Zoppello > >> > >> Guillaume Nodet ha scritto: > >> > Andrea, I've just downloaded the source zip of the components and it > >> > seems that there is lots of components coming from ServiceMix: are > >> > these differents in some sort ? Bug fixes, enhancements ? If so what > >> > about raising JIRAs and attaching your patches ? I know you have > >> > already done so and iirc i have applied them ... > >> > > >> > On 10/9/07, Andrea Zoppello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi Bruce, > >> >> > >> >> You can take a look at: > >> >> > >> >> http://forge.objectweb.org/projects/spagic > >> >> > >> >> In the project site you could find the source code. > >> >> > >> >> By the way some information the spagic TCP component is based on > >> apache > >> >> mina. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Andrea Zoppello > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Bruce Snyder ha scritto: > >> >> > >> >>> On 10/8/07, jpuro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>>> Yup, that makes sense. But after looking at spagic it seems that > >> they > >> >>>> already use mina in a similar fashion and handle a lot of other > >> requirements > >> >>>> for tcp/ip etc. Take a look at their source code and let me know > >> what you > >> >>>> think. Otherwise I'll just implement my own version on apache mina > >> as I > >> >>>> have seen camel-mina do. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>> Please provide a URL to the source of the code you're looking at. > >> >>> > >> >>> Bruce > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Guillaume Nodet > > ------------------------ > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Basic-TCP-component-tf4592566s12049.html#a13117891 > Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
