> Strange about the behavior under HTTP... I'm amazed too. I thought it was critical problem until I tried HTTPS to make sure SSL is working - and bingo, it was fine that way. Some stupid problem in Harmony, I suppose.
Vasily -----Original Message----- From: Kevan Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 2:26 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Geronimo 2.0.2 starts on Harmony! On Jan 17, 2008, at 6:15 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote: > Hi, all, > > Well, finally I can say Geronimo 2.0.2 starts and works on Apache > Harmony! > Some steps yet need to be taken for that to happen - see [1] for > details. > > Some issues were overcome, some workarounded, and some just hotfixed > and > wait for their proper resolution, like GERONIMO-3757. > > Three important problems that still need investigation are: > - HTTP interface works badly (HTTPS works fine). > - The application takes up all the CPU resources on both cores I have > available so the machine is 100% busy. > - The application takes up all the memory specified in -Xms option. > > Otherwise, I was able to browse the console freely and even deploy > SPECjAppServer2004. > No serious load was tested however. Nice. Congrats Vasily. Sounds like we have a little ways to go... Let us know what you find about memory and CPU consumption... Strange about the behavior under HTTP... --kevan
