Sorry, I meant to say:
On Apr 17, 2008, at 7:11 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Apr 16, 2008, at 8:49 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I'd like to see an example in action before I commit myself but so
far I don't see any problems with this. I assume you have already
or will soon verify this doesn't cause problems with the tck :-)
I wonder if a package name with "osgi" in it somewhere would be
more appropriate?
There are some specs (jacc for instance) that use a system property
to figure out what to create. I've always thought this was a less
than brilliant idea and wonder if we can do something similar for
those. I also wonder if there is a way to generalize the osgi
method so it might work in some non-osgi environments.
-1 technical veto
These are spec jars and extending the behavior of these jars on an
ad hoc basis is bad and possibly violates the licenses of the JSRs
they implement.
Regards,
Alan
