Seems that as a "community" we should keep our project name as part of
all groupIds we generate...
If no one else feels that way, then fine, I will not call for a vote,
but my opinion stands... :-)
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Dec 17, 2008, at 7:27 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Dec 16, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Seems like something we should vote on, given our specs, samples,
components and plugin subprojects all use org.apache.geronimo.*
IMO specs, samples, components and plugins are all specific to
geronimo, so the sub-package makes sense. xbean on the other hand is
not geronimo specific directly under o.a.
IMO GShell is not geronimo-specific, closer in nature to xbean than to
specs or components.
So for me the change of packages makes a lot of sense.
I agree.
There's no requirement that sub-projects fall under a top-level project
namespace. There are certainly lots of examples of this... XBean and
Yoko being two examples within Geronimo. There are lot's of examples
outside of Geronimo...
If we have a fundamental difference of opinion on this, then we can
certainly put it to a group vote. Barring such a disagreement, I don't
think a vote is needed... I'll assume that subsequent discussion will
determine if a vote is needed.
--kevan
