-1
Agree with Jeremy that we need to include the required notice in the jar.
-Donald
Jeremy Bauer wrote:
David,
While searching the JSR-317 draft for direction regarding early access
naming, I found that the notice (page 2) includes the clauses below,
notably item iii. Does clause iii need to be added to the NOTICE in the
EA jar? Also, should the Geronimo EA NOTICE use "JPA 2.0 EARLY ACCESS"
instead of simply "JPA 2.0" in order to meet clause ii?
<jsr-317 draft>
NOTICE
...
2.Distribute implementations of the Specification to third parties for
their testing and evaluation use, provided that any such implementation:
(i) does not modify, subset, superset or otherwise extend the Licensor
Name Space, or include any public or protected packages, classes, Java
interfaces, fields or methods within the Licensor Name Space other than
those required/authorized by the Specification or Specifications being
implemented;
(ii)is clearly and prominently marked with the word "UNTESTED" or "EARLY
ACCESS" or "INCOMPATIBLE"
or "UNSTABLE" or "BETA" in any list of available builds and in proximity
to every link initiating its download, where the list or link is under
Licensee's control; and
(iii)includes the following notice:
"This is an implementation of an early-draft specification developed
under the Java Community Process (JCP) and is made available for testing
and evaluation purposes only. The code is not compatible with any
specification of the JCP."
</jsr-317 draft>
-Jeremy
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:25 PM, David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com
<mailto:david_jen...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
I've been working with the OpenJPA project to develop the jpa 2.0
spec jar in our spec repository. They are ready for their first
early access milestone release.
I've staged the release here:
http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec/1.0-EA-1/
The svn location is here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-EA-1
I haven't staged the site. I don't think its necessary for a early
access release, but will reconsider on request.
I ran rat on the project, and the autochecking thinks the legal
files are ok.
Vote open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
thanks
david jencks
