No, as our naming matches what Sun used for their EA jars of the JAXWS
2.1 API -
http://download.java.net/maven/1/javax.xml.ws/jars/
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
On legal-discuss, Geir indicated he would try to get (iii) removed which
might mean this vote could resume.
Does anyone think we need to name the version (or artifactID)
differently based on (ii)?
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 29, 2009, at 9:33 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Looks like a problem.
I sent a note to legal-discuss about (iii).
I'll work on setting up a new release candidate.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 29, 2009, at 7:46 AM, Jeremy Bauer wrote:
David,
While searching the JSR-317 draft for direction regarding early
access naming, I found that the notice (page 2) includes the clauses
below, notably item iii. Does clause iii need to be added to the
NOTICE in the EA jar? Also, should the Geronimo EA NOTICE use "JPA
2.0 EARLY ACCESS" instead of simply "JPA 2.0" in order to meet clause
ii?
<jsr-317 draft>
NOTICE
...
2.Distribute implementations of the Specification to third parties
for their testing and evaluation use, provided that any such
implementation:
(i) does not modify, subset, superset or otherwise extend the
Licensor Name Space, or include any public or protected packages,
classes, Java interfaces, fields or methods within the Licensor Name
Space other than those required/authorized by the Specification or
Specifications being implemented;
(ii)is clearly and prominently marked with the word "UNTESTED" or
"EARLY ACCESS" or "INCOMPATIBLE"
or "UNSTABLE" or "BETA" in any list of available builds and in
proximity to every link initiating its download, where the list or
link is under Licensee's control; and
(iii)includes the following notice:
"This is an implementation of an early-draft specification developed
under the Java Community Process (JCP) and is made available for
testing and evaluation purposes only. The code is not compatible with
any specification of the JCP."
</jsr-317 draft>
-Jeremy
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:25 PM, David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com
<mailto:david_jen...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
I've been working with the OpenJPA project to develop the jpa 2.0
spec jar in our spec repository. They are ready for their first
early access milestone release.
I've staged the release here:
http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec/1.0-EA-1/
The svn location is here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-EA-1
I haven't staged the site. I don't think its necessary for a
early access release, but will reconsider on request.
I ran rat on the project, and the autochecking thinks the legal
files are ok.
Vote open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
thanks
david jencks
