Hey again all, I think that this may caused by my rather extreme entity relationships and the use of OpenJPA's proprietary @ElementJoinColumn annotation.
I have the following relationship structure: project - projectDetail (project 1->M projectDetail using @EJC) - component (projectDetail 1->1 component) - componentAttribute (component 1->M componentAttribute using @EJC) - attribute (componentAttribute 1->1 attribute) - compAttribValue (componentAttribute 1->1 compAttribValue) - componentClass (component 1->1 componentClass) - classAttrib (componentClass 1->M classAttrib using @EJC) - attribute (classAttrib 1-> attribute) And I am basically trying to clone a project entity. I have debugging code that says it is creating and attaching all of the necessary details (which it is) containing the appropriate components (which it is not). I am only getting the first projectDetail persisted to the database fully. All subsequent are not getting their components created. I will try to create a test that has a similarly complicated entity relationship but uses only JPA standard links. If that works - how should we handle it? If the assembly passes TCK, and the problem is only related to the use of an OpenJPA proprietary annotation, should we just issue a note that the use of that annotation may cause problems? Jay Joe Bohn wrote: > Hi Jay, > > Yes, please do let us know. > > I'm nearly done generating a new set of images and will start the vote > again shortly. > > However, as the previous comments indicate, the images themselves are > not functionally different than what you are using ... just adding in a > missing license header and removing some unnecessary text in the > README.txt file. > > Thanks, > Joe > > Jay D. McHugh wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> I know that this vote is cancelled, but I tried my real app on 2.1.4 RC1 >> and some JPA entities are not working the way they used to on 2.1.3. >> >> I am trying to figure out if I have been taking advantage of a bug that >> has since been corrected - or if a problem snuck into JPA. >> >> I will let you all know as soon as I figure out which is the case. >> >> Jay >> >> Joe Bohn wrote: >>> Message created for any discussion of the pending Geronimo 2.1.4 RC1 >>> currently up for vote. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Joe >> >