Hey again all,
I think that this may caused by my rather extreme entity relationships
and the use of OpenJPA's proprietary @ElementJoinColumn annotation.
I have the following relationship structure:
project
- projectDetail (project 1->M projectDetail using @EJC)
- component (projectDetail 1->1 component)
- componentAttribute (component 1->M componentAttribute using @EJC)
- attribute (componentAttribute 1->1 attribute)
- compAttribValue (componentAttribute 1->1 compAttribValue)
- componentClass (component 1->1 componentClass)
- classAttrib (componentClass 1->M classAttrib using @EJC)
- attribute (classAttrib 1-> attribute)
And I am basically trying to clone a project entity. I have debugging
code that says it is creating and attaching all of the necessary details
(which it is) containing the appropriate components (which it is not).
I am only getting the first projectDetail persisted to the database
fully. All subsequent are not getting their components created.
I will try to create a test that has a similarly complicated entity
relationship but uses only JPA standard links.
If that works - how should we handle it? If the assembly passes TCK,
and the problem is only related to the use of an OpenJPA proprietary
annotation, should we just issue a note that the use of that annotation
may cause problems?
Jay
Joe Bohn wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> Yes, please do let us know.
>
> I'm nearly done generating a new set of images and will start the vote
> again shortly.
>
> However, as the previous comments indicate, the images themselves are
> not functionally different than what you are using ... just adding in a
> missing license header and removing some unnecessary text in the
> README.txt file.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
> Jay D. McHugh wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I know that this vote is cancelled, but I tried my real app on 2.1.4 RC1
>> and some JPA entities are not working the way they used to on 2.1.3.
>>
>> I am trying to figure out if I have been taking advantage of a bug that
>> has since been corrected - or if a problem snuck into JPA.
>>
>> I will let you all know as soon as I figure out which is the case.
>>
>> Jay
>>
>> Joe Bohn wrote:
>>> Message created for any discussion of the pending Geronimo 2.1.4 RC1
>>> currently up for vote.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Joe
>>
>
