2009/6/22 David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com> > > On Jun 19, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Ivan wrote: > > Currently, what I can see are > 1. Recover those configurations that we used for Tomcat in the server.xml > > > For connectors, I may have done most of this in my work for (3).... could > use some checking. I'd also like to see if I can make the tomcat connectors > use our thread pool -- a new feature I've wanted for years :-) > > 2. Update the console codes, and decide whether we need to keep the > functions like add/remove connectors. If keep, the way we do it is to > add/remove ConnectorGBean or to marshall/remarshall server.xml. > 3. Make those settings in the server.xml not hardcoded. > > > I implemented this here, not sure if I'll get it committed today or > tomorrow > > 4. Recover those GBeans that console/other components used, such as > AccessLogValve etc. > > > Maybe the AccessLogValve can fish its valve out of the server like the > engine gbean now does? >
I will try to do it, Valve is a bit different with the Engine, for it has no name attribute, and Engine/Host all could hold to a list of them. My way is to use the "seq" to identify it, like what it is done by its object name. > > thanks > david jencks > > > I would like to work at parts of them, if we have decided to import this > feature in 2.2. And I suggest that we open a JIRA for each of them, so that > we could track them clearly. > Thanks ! > Ivan > > 2009/6/20 David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com> > >> After fixing the HostGBean in web app plan problem I don't have a very >> clear idea of what's missing here. If one of you do could you please list >> in detail what needs to be done? >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> On Jun 19, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Ivan wrote: >> >> It is easy to add the SSL connector, the things that Jack concens is that, >> how do the changes affect other components, I think. >> Ivan >> >> 2009/6/19 Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com> >> >>> >>> On Jun 19, 2009, at 2:31 AM, Jack Cai wrote: >>> >>> Looks like this is going be a piece of non-trivial work. Considering >>>> that we are going for a 2.2 release, should we re-evaluate whether this >>>> feature should be in 2.2? My gut feeling is no. We should really stablize >>>> the code and resovle TCK issues. >>>> >>> >>> If it's *hard* to add the SSL connector configuration, then something is >>> clearly wrong. Personally, I'd be pretty interested in seeing this type of >>> support in 2.2. The more Tomcat apps/configurations that just run on >>> Geronimo, the better off we are... >>> >>> --kevan >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ivan >> >> >> > > > -- > Ivan > > > -- Ivan
