On Jun 21, 2009, at 10:20 PM, Ivan wrote:
2009/6/22 David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
On Jun 19, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Ivan wrote:
Currently, what I can see are
1. Recover those configurations that we used for Tomcat in the
server.xml
For connectors, I may have done most of this in my work for (3)....
could use some checking. I'd also like to see if I can make the
tomcat connectors use our thread pool -- a new feature I've wanted
for years :-)
2. Update the console codes, and decide whether we need to keep the
functions like add/remove connectors. If keep, the way we do it is
to add/remove ConnectorGBean or to marshall/remarshall server.xml.
3. Make those settings in the server.xml not hardcoded.
I implemented this here, not sure if I'll get it committed today or
tomorrow
I committed this in rev 787153. I exposed the replacement code the
local attribute manager uses. I'm thinking of modifying the activemq
integration to use this method instead of spring property substitution.
4. Recover those GBeans that console/other components used, such as
AccessLogValve etc.
Maybe the AccessLogValve can fish its valve out of the server like
the engine gbean now does?
I will try to do it, Valve is a bit different with the Engine,
for it has no name attribute, and Engine/Host all could hold to a
list of them.
My way is to use the "seq" to identify it, like what it is done
by its object name.
Looking forward to seeing this!
thanks
david jencks
thanks
david jencks
I would like to work at parts of them, if we have decided to import
this feature in 2.2. And I suggest that we open a JIRA for each of
them, so that we could track them clearly.
Thanks !
Ivan
2009/6/20 David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
After fixing the HostGBean in web app plan problem I don't have a
very clear idea of what's missing here. If one of you do could you
please list in detail what needs to be done?
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 19, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Ivan wrote:
It is easy to add the SSL connector, the things that Jack concens
is that, how do the changes affect other components, I think.
Ivan
2009/6/19 Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com>
On Jun 19, 2009, at 2:31 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
Looks like this is going be a piece of non-trivial work.
Considering that we are going for a 2.2 release, should we re-
evaluate whether this feature should be in 2.2? My gut feeling is
no. We should really stablize the code and resovle TCK issues.
If it's *hard* to add the SSL connector configuration, then
something is clearly wrong. Personally, I'd be pretty interested
in seeing this type of support in 2.2. The more Tomcat apps/
configurations that just run on Geronimo, the better off we are...
--kevan
--
Ivan
--
Ivan
--
Ivan
