I'd like to try it :-)
-Rex

2009/7/15 David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>

> Jay -- many thanks for trying out the patch and committing it.
>
> I think the last artifact in our svn repo is the dojo 0.4.3.  I can't find
> it released anywhere but the source code is in a handy svn repo.  I cooked
> up a modification of our war-packaging for it that uses the maven scm plugin
> to check out the source so it can be packaged easily.  I wonder if someone
> could try this out and see if it works?
>
> -- check out new war project and build it
> svn co
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/external/trunk/geronimo-dojo-0.4.3
> cd geronimo-dojo-0.4.3
> mvn clean install
>
> -- modify the plugins/dojo-legacy stuff so that
> geronimo-dojo-legacy is not built
> the dojo-legacy-jetty and dojo-legacy-tomcat plugins use the
> geronimo-dojo-0.4.3-1.0-SNAPSHOT war file instead of the
> geronimo-dojo-legacy war.
>
> -- build the server and see if the parts that use the legacy dojo still
> work  (debug views??? I'm not sure)
>
> many thanks
> david jencks
>
>
>
> On Jul 10, 2009, at 6:58 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 5:59 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hey David,
>>>>
>>>> I'm starting to take a look at it today.
>>>>
>>>> They have a 1.3.1 version out - any objections to me switching the patch
>>>> to use it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not at all -- I just thought I'd start small since usually I change 18
>>> things at once and then can't tell what change broke what feature :-)
>>>
>>> I think kevan mentioned offline he might take a look also.  I think I've
>>> been running locally with this patch for a couple weeks and haven't seen any
>>> admin console problems, but that doesn't mean much one way or another.
>>>
>>
>> I built with the patch and ran testsuite on Jetty. Everything looked good
>> to me (except for a corba-testsuite test that hung).
>>
>> Jay,
>> If you can test with the latest Dojo version and things look good to you,
>> I'd say go ahead and apply the updates.
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>

Reply via email to