I was sort of waiting for a decision on whether those couple of problems raised in the discuss thread were blockers or not. I guess they're not, so here's my +1 too.

Rick

Kevan Miller wrote:
Here's my +1. I reviewed the source and binaries in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/

--kevan

On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:

I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin.

This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.

See the jira issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>

Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>

The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>

If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them.


[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Many thanks
david jencks


Reply via email to