Rick
Kevan Miller wrote:
Here's my +1. I reviewed the source and binaries in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/--kevan On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin.This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. See the jira issues here:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>Staged tohttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archiveshttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them.[ ] +1 about time to push this out the door [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) Many thanks david jencks