I'm still not happy about the README & RELEASE_NOTES missing from the assemblies ... so I was kinda hoping some other more critical problem was found so that we could include these on a re-spin :-) . However, I don't think it makes sense to stop the vote for just that so here is my +1.

Everything else I checked looked good.

Joe



David Jencks wrote:
I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the maven-release-plugin.

This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.

See the jira issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>

Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/ <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>

The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>

If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something plausible builds from them.


[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Many thanks
david jencks

Reply via email to