Believe these are okay after second look. +1
-Donald On 4/22/10 3:43 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > Here are 3 scripts <attached> to help checkout, rat:check and build the > tags in the vote. > > Can we ignore the following rat:check failures? > > geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0 - > src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/xml.xsd > src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd > > geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7 - > src/test/resources/wmtom.bin > > geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider - > Several files under - src/main/resources/OSGI-INF/providers/ > > > > -Donald > > > On 4/22/10 1:03 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: >> On 4/22/2010 12:58 PM, Donald Woods wrote: >>> 1) Rick, I think the staging repo included below is for the RC2 vote. >>> Shouldn't it be - >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-007/ >>> >>> 2) You hadn't dropped the previous 030 staging files in Nexus yet (from >>> 4/16), so I did that for you. >>> >> Thanks. I remembered at one point that I needed to so that, but forgot >> to go back and do the actual trop. >> >>> 3) The JPA spec below should be listed as geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1, >>> based on the tag and files in the 007 staging repo. >>> >> >> Unless I'm missing something, that's exactly how it IS listed. I >> corrected the error of the last cycle to make this 1.1 not 1.2. >> >> Rick >>> >>> -Donald >>> >>> >>> On 4/22/10 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: >>> >>>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to >>>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a >>>> single vote >>>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have >>>> been updated >>>> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins >>>> have been run against >>>> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests. >>>> All tag svn versions have been >>>> successfully built. >>>> >>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>> >>>> >>>> Staging repo: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/ >>>> >>>> >>>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location >>>> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/ >>>> >>>> and have the same final element as the artifact name. >>>> >>>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list >>>> server rejected my >>>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the >>>> email. I apologize for the incovenience. >>>> >>>> The following specs are being voted on >>>> >>>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1 >>>> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0 >>>> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0 >>>> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0 >>>> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0 >>>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0 >>>> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0 >>>> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0 >>>> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.1 >>>> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1 >>>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7 >>>> >>>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases. >>>> >>>> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8 >>>> >>>> Source location: >>>> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8 >>>> >>>> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0 >>>> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1 >>>> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1 >>>> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0 >>>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0 >>>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0 >>>> geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1 >>>> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0 >>>> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0 >>>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1 >>>> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0 >>>> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0 >>>> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1 >>>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3 >>>> >>>> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not >>>> been verified via TCK yet) >>>> >>>> >>> >> >>
