Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing 
information properly. Thanks!

One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have 
svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't define the 
file type in our recommended client configuration -- 
https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html. We might 
want to consider updating...

A few questions:

* jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed (CDDL/GPL)?
* jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains both 
LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed in the jar?

--kevan

On Apr 23, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:

> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the newly 
> created bundles components.
> This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have been 
> converted into OSGi jars.
> This is a single vote for all of the converted dependencies required for the 
> Geronimo 3.0-M1 release.
> 
> A note on the bundle version numbers.  The numbering scheme uses the version 
> number from the original component jar, with a Geronimo version number added 
> using a "_n" suffix (all of these are the "_1" version).  The Derby version, 
> 10.5.3.0_1_1 is not a type.  This is the wrappering based on the 10.5.3.0_1 
> version of Derby.
> 
> The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against of the projects.  All tag svn 
> versions have been
> successfully built.
> 
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> 
> Staging repo:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-016/
> 
> All source repos are relative to location
> 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/bundles/tags
> 
> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
> 
> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list server 
> rejected my
> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the email.  I 
> apologize for the incovenience.
> 
> The following components are being voted on
> 
> bundles-parent-1.0  (this is just the parent pom for all of the bundle 
> components)
> 
> aspectjrt-1.6.2_1
> aspectjweaver-1.6.2_1
> axis-1.4_1
> backport-util-concurrent-2.2_1
> castor-1.0.5_1
> commons-digester-1.8_1
> commons-discovery-0.4_1
> derby-all-10.5.3.0_1_1
> dwr-3.0.M1_1
> httpcore-4.0.1_1
> jaxb-impl-2.2_1
> jstl-1.2_1
> scannotation-1.0.2_1
> sxc-jaxb-0.7.2_1
> sxc-runtime-0.7.2_1
> wadi-aop-2.1.2_1
> wadi-core-2.1.2_1
> wadi-group-2.1.2_1
> wadi-tribes-2.1.2_1
> woden-impl-dom-1.0M8_1
> woodstox-3.2.9_1
> 

Reply via email to