+1 (with jaxb-impl excluded from the vote) -Donald
On 4/27/10 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: >> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: >> >> >>> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: >>> >>>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the >>>> licensing information properly. Thanks! >>>> >>>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have >>>> svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't >>>> define the file type in our recommended client configuration -- >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html. >>>> We might want to consider updating... >>>> >>>> A few questions: >>>> >>>> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed >>>> (CDDL/GPL)? >>>> >>>> >>> The only license I've found for this is CDDL. >>> >> This URL seems to indicate that JAXB is dual licensed -- >> https://jaxb.dev.java.net/2.2/ >> >> If so, we should include the full license text and make sure we >> indicate our license choice (CDDL). Some versions of the dual license >> include instructions on how to apply to a work. Don't see any reason >> not to use the same wording... >> > I just discovered something very useful to know. You can delete > directories from a Nexus staging repository after the item has been > closed. I've removed the jaxb-impl from the staging area, and will > rollback just the release of that single item and stage a new vote for > just jaxb-impl. This vote will now be for all of the bundles except for > jaxb-impl, which will allow this to proceed without cancelling the > entire vote. > > Rick > > >>> >>>> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains >>>> both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed >>>> in the jar? >>>> >>>> >>> Yes, the LICENSE.txt file came from the original jar. >>> >> Thanks. >> >> --kevan >> > >
