Right, that is why the final release needs to be called 3.0.0.final or 3.0.0.release and cannot be called 3.0.0!
3.0.0.final > 3.0.0.M1 3.0.0.release > 3.0.0.m1 Lin On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Keep in mind that in osgi, 3.0.0.m1 > 3.0.0 !!! > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 15:24, Lin Sun <linsun....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I think no. 3 is cool. some other qualifiers that I can think of are >> >> 3.0.0.m1, 3.0.0.m2, 3.0.0.release >> >> >> Lin >> >> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Jarek Gawor <jga...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Before the milestone release we might have to figure out what osgi >> > version (if any) the Geronimo packages should be exported at. I can >> > think of a few possibilities: >> > >> > 1) No version exported for milestone releases. In the final release >> > everything would be exported with "3.0.0" version. >> > >> > 2) Use version "3.0.0" for milestones and final release. Milestones >> > are milestones and should not be used once the final is out. >> > >> > 3) Add some qualifier to the osgi version for milestone and final >> > releases. We just need to be careful to pick the right qualifiers so >> > that osgi resolves to the latest version. For example for milestones >> > we could assign "3.0.0.M1" or "3.0.0.M2" but for the final we would >> > have to assign "3.0.0.final" or some other qualifier that is greater >> > then 'Mx' using String.compareTo() rules. >> > >> > Thoughts or any other possibilities? I like #3 (or some version of it) >> > but I'm also ok with #2. >> > >> > Jarek >> > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com > > >
