BTW, I found this - http://groups.google.com/group/atinject-observer/browse_thread/thread/6eb81864296495e3/7834cf0821c8f358?#7834cf0821c8f358
I think the instruction were from the authors of the tck, while they gave examples of running this tck by itself with the injector, which in our case is the open web bean jar(s). Lin On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Lin Sun <linsun....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Donald > > Thanks for the reply. I am not familar with BVAL tck. Can you point > me the suiteXmlFiles? Also does the BVAL tck provides a valid > archive to be deployed to a App server? > > Please see more comments in line. > > Lin > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org> wrote: >> It looks like the same general setup as the BVAL tck, in that it uses >> the surefire plugin and a suiteXmlFiles which is either provided in the >> downloaded TCK files or provided locally (which I don't think we can use >> the open web beans overrides unless we have TCK challenges approved by >> Oracle.) > > Could you please explain why we could not use the tck runner from open > web beans? If we want to run the tests ourselves, we could copy some > files to make it happen. They are all under ASL v2.0. > > atinject tck itself didn't provide any instruction on how to run them, > other than the java doc. In the javadoc, it indicates the test needs > to be configured with your injector. There is no mentioning of > running this against a real App Server. The fact that they didn't > provide a java ee archive and only provided .class files made me > believe deploy/configure the class files onto the injector is > sufficient. >
