Hi David Jencks, Many cases in interop and webservices failed with following similar exception at deployment phase after your owb/openejb refactor. Seems deploymentinfo does not get initialized correclty in
org.apache.geronimo.openejb.EjbDeployment.initialize(BeanContext) { ... } at all. could you please take a look ? Caused by: org.apache.geronimo.gbean.InvalidConfigurationException: Configuration xxx failed to start due following reasons: The service EJBModule=xxxx.jar,J2EEApplication=default/xxxx/1-default/car,SingletonBean=xxxx,j WSLink,name=xxxx did not start because null java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.geronimo.openejb.EjbDeployment.getBeanClass(EjbDeployment.java:239) at org.apache.geronimo.axis2.ejb.EJBWebServiceGBean.<init>(EJBWebServiceGBean.java:76) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:513) at org.apache.xbean.recipe.ReflectionUtil$ConstructorFactory.create(ReflectionUtil.java:958) at org.apache.xbean.recipe.ObjectRecipe.internalCreate(ObjectRecipe.java:276) at org.apache.xbean.recipe.AbstractRecipe.create(AbstractRecipe.java:96) at org.apache.xbean.recipe.AbstractRecipe.create(AbstractRecipe.java:61) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.createInstance(GBeanInstance.java:940) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.attemptFullStart(GBeanInstanceState.java:271) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.start(GBeanInstanceState.java:105) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.startRecursive(GBeanInstanceState.java:127) at org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.startRecursive(GBeanInstance.java:567) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.startRecursiveGBean(BasicKernel.java:386) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.startConfigurationGBeans(ConfigurationUtil.java:462) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.KernelConfigurationManager.start(KernelConfigurationManager.java:226) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.SimpleConfigurationManager.startConfiguration(SimpleConfigurationManager.java:702) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.SimpleConfigurationManager.startConfiguration(SimpleConfigurationManager.java:681) at org.apache.geronimo.deployment.plugin.local.StartCommand.run(StartCommand.java:67) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:10 PM, David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>wrote: > > On Jul 13, 2011, at 9:46 PM, David Blevins wrote: > > > > > On Jul 11, 2011, at 12:54 AM, David Jencks wrote: > > > >> > testSpecializedBeanNotInstantiated(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.EnterpriseBeanSpecializationIntegrationTest) > >> > testSpecializingBeanHasBindingsOfSpecializedAndSpecializingBean(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.EnterpriseBeanSpecializationTest) > >> > testSpecializingBeanHasNameOfSpecializedBean(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.EnterpriseBeanSpecializationTest) > >> > testSpecializingClassDirectlyExtendsNothing(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.broken.directlyExtendsNothing.DirectlyExtendsNothingTest) > >> > testSpecializingClassDirectlyExtendsSimpleBean(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.broken.directlyExtendsSimpleBean.DirectlyExtendsSimpleBeanTest) > >> > testSpecializingClassImplementsInterfaceAndExtendsNothing(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.broken.implementInterfaceAndExtendsNothing.ImplementsInterfaceAndExtendsNothingTest) > >> > testSpecializingAndSpecializedBeanHasName(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.broken.sameName.SameNameTest) > > > > Have all but 3 of these passing in the embedded container in my local > copy. The 3 that fail are "broken" ones. Simply need to add validation for > those. My impl code is a bit hacked -- currently only works for @Stateful > and not exactly implemented in the right spot -- but otherwise looks like a > good approach. Will clean it up and check it in tomorrow. > > > > > > Excellent! On the geronimo side I've changed things around so that we have > one openejb appInfo tree for the entire application and use it to set up the > owb context. This _ought_ to fix the problem in g. that I was seeing that > the owb context didn't include any of the specialized classes (since it was > looking at only one of the modules in the ear). However I'm still cleaning > up loose ends so apps will deploy ok :-) > > thanks > david jencks > > > > -David > > > > -- Shawn