Hi!

But target is 1.6, so it should run fine on jdk-1.6, right?

LieGrue,
strub




----- Original Message -----
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 11:01
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec says
> 
> "This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It
> requires Java 6 or higher. "
> 
> Not sure it is a blocker or not.
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2013/11/25 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>:
>>  Good evening!
>> 
>>  I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
>> 
>>  The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch 
> TCK.
>> 
>>  The staging repo is
>>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
>> 
>>  The source release is here
>> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip
>> 
>>  The tag can be found here
>> 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
>> 
>>  [+1] ship it
>>  [+0] meh, don't care
>>  [-1] nope, because ${reason}
>> 
>>  Here is my +1
>> 
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to