Hmm, maybe we should move to git before they do the proxy. Any blocker? Want to give a try for jbake? TomEE and Meecrowave have pdf support for pages which can be something we want to import (nice for offline reading) but can be done after. Anyway, big +1 for it.
Le 18 juil. 2017 06:38, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit : > Great, txs a bunch! > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 18.07.2017 um 00:10 schrieb John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:02 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Le 17 juil. 2017 04:13, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a écrit > : > > All, > > > > Would anyone be against mirroring the Geronimo Config module on github? > I think it would be a good thing to get more people aware of the feature. > > > > +1 > > > > > > Ok, I've requested it https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-14619 though at some point we > may want to consider git repos (which are now fully self serve). > > > > > > Second, who can I talk to get access to edit http://geronimo.apache.org/ > ? I think it would be good to start adding docs on how to use Config. > > > > Do we want to use confluence or use a static generated site? (Based on > jbake?) > > > > This option makes it easier to contribute IMO and to maintain. > > > > I agree, the usage of confluence for a website feels weird. I wouldn't > mind spending time working on a new website for Geronimo. I've been able > to get jbake working obviously for other sites. > > > > > > > > John > > > >
