I'm actually quite happy with SVN for Geronimo. In SVN you can easily move things around. In GIT you have to create a separate repo for each module. That might become a bit much So for now SVN works fine for me. No strong feelings though.
LieGrue, strub > Am 18.07.2017 um 07:28 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > > Hmm, maybe we should move to git before they do the proxy. Any blocker? > > Want to give a try for jbake? TomEE and Meecrowave have pdf support for pages > which can be something we want to import (nice for offline reading) but can > be done after. Anyway, big +1 for it. > > Le 18 juil. 2017 06:38, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit : > Great, txs a bunch! > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 18.07.2017 um 00:10 schrieb John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:02 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Le 17 juil. 2017 04:13, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > All, > > > > Would anyone be against mirroring the Geronimo Config module on github? I > > think it would be a good thing to get more people aware of the feature. > > > > +1 > > > > > > Ok, I've requested it > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-14619 > > though at some point we may want to consider git repos (which are now fully > > self serve). > > > > > > Second, who can I talk to get access to edit http://geronimo.apache.org/ ? > > I think it would be good to start adding docs on how to use Config. > > > > Do we want to use confluence or use a static generated site? (Based on > > jbake?) > > > > This option makes it easier to contribute IMO and to maintain. > > > > I agree, the usage of confluence for a website feels weird. I wouldn't > > mind spending time working on a new website for Geronimo. I've been able > > to get jbake working obviously for other sites. > > > > > > > > John > > >
