It makes sense to me. Regards JB
> Le 12 mai 2021 à 09:20, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit : > > I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then discuss > those separate without having any pressure. > Wdyt? > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon <francois.pa...@openobject.fr>: >> >> Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward! >> >> regards, >> >> François >> fpa...@apache.org >> Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit : >>> +1 to have one repo per spec >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> François >>> fpa...@apache.org >>> Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : >>>> Guess we should stick to what we are used to. >>>> The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we do >>>> one repo per atomic release. >>>> For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it or >>>> work with infra to bulk migrate it). >>>> Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will: >>>> >>>> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users) >>>> 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to that ;)) >>>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book >>>> >>>> >>>> Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> a >>>> écrit : >>>>> Hi Mark, >>>>> >>>>> I guess you mean for the release ? >>>>> >>>>> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo (it’s >>>>> what I’m doing at ServiceMix). >>>>> >>>>> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec (less >>>>> convenient anyway). >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit : >>>>> > >>>>> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own git >>>>> > repo, isn't? >>>>> > >>>>> > LieGrue, >>>>> > strub >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Hi, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project >>>>> >> repositories from svn to gitbox. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I think we can start with this projects: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/ >>>>> >> >>>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/ >>>>> >> >>>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/ >>>>> >> >>>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> regards, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> -- >>>>> >> François >>>>> >> fpa...@apache.org >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> >
