You mean having a vote per spec repository? regards,
François [email protected] Le 12/05/2021 à 09:20, Mark Struberg a écrit : > I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then > discuss those separate without having any pressure. > Wdyt? > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >> Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward! >> >> regards, >> >> François >> [email protected] >> Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit : >>> >>> +1 to have one repo per spec >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> François >>> [email protected] >>> Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : >>>> Guess we should stick to what we are used to. >>>> The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say >>>> we do one repo per atomic release. >>>> For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it >>>> or work with infra to bulk migrate it). >>>> Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will: >>>> >>>> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users) >>>> 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to >>>> that ;)) >>>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github >>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : >>>> >>>> Hi Mark, >>>> >>>> I guess you mean for the release ? >>>> >>>> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single >>>> repo (it’s what I’m doing at ServiceMix). >>>> >>>> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per >>>> spec (less convenient anyway). >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : >>>> > >>>> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as >>>> own git repo, isn't? >>>> > >>>> > LieGrue, >>>> > strub >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>: >>>> >> >>>> >> Hi, >>>> >> >>>> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our >>>> project >>>> >> repositories from svn to gitbox. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> I think we can start with this projects: >>>> >> >>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/ >>>> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/> >>>> >> >>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/ >>>> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/> >>>> >> >>>> >> - >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/ >>>> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/> >>>> >> >>>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ >>>> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects: >>>> >> >>>> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo >>>> <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want >>>> to move. >>>> >> >>>> >> regards, >>>> >> >>>> >> -- >>>> >> François >>>> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >
