+1 On Mon., Jun. 6, 2022, 06:43 Romain Manni-Bucau, <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > Think it makes sense since most of contributors of the original projects > abandonned Microprofile due to the policy they apply to the project AFAIK > and there is not much interest there anymore AFAIK. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le lun. 6 juin 2022 à 11:00, fpapon <fpa...@apache.org> a écrit : > >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to start a thread to discuss about the future of the Apache >> Geronimo Microprofile implementation: >> >> https://geronimo.apache.org/microprofile/ >> >> As we can see, we don't have a lot of traction about the maintenance of >> the implementation to be up-to-date with the Microprofile specification. >> >> The J2EE Geronimo server is no longer exist and at Apache, the active EE >> server seems to be Apache TomEE. >> >> May be it could make more sense to move the Microprofile implementation >> to the Apache TomEE umbrella. >> >> WDYT? >> >> regards, >> >> -- >> -- >> François >> >>
