Also, just to make sure we're on the same page on the munge topic and GSoC, I started the bureaucracy for the project, but I won't be able to mentor also that project. I plan to mentor the tinkerpop project, in case we get a student. In case we get students for both projects, somebody would step in for the munge one?
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Claudio Martella < [email protected]> wrote: > I am afraid we're not going to get students this round. We really moved at > the last minute. On this topic, I sent a couple of emails to master > students mailing lists to a couple of universities, but if you guys could > also forward some recruiting emails to whom you think would be suitable, it > would probably help. Maybe also Sebastian can help here at TU Berlin? > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Eli Reisman <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Thats a good point. It would represent a temporary solution. I'd like to >> see us done with munge for all sorts of reasons if its possible. Might be >> a >> difficult student project to complete cleanly though. Any other thoughts >> on >> this? >> >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Nitay Joffe <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Just FYI our use of munge does not prevent us from doing binary jar >> > release. We can use classifier to release multiple Giraph jars (each >> built >> > for different Hadoop). >> > >> > See e.g. >> > >> > >> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-deploy-plugin/examples/deploying-with-classifiers.html >> > >> > >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3092085/building-same-project-in-maven-with-different-artifactid-based-on-jdk-used >> > >> > So we would have like giraph-1.0.0-hadoop-0.20.203.0.jar, >> > giraph-1.0.0-hadoop-2.0.0.jar, etc >> > >> > Seems to me like we don't know how long it will take to get rid of >> munge. >> > Perhaps we should do this as pulling in Giraph into Maven projects would >> > make it a lot easier for others to work with and lessen the barrier to >> > entry? >> > >> > - Nitay >> > >> > On Apr 16, 2013, at 1:36 AM, Avery Ching <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > Okay, we're on our 3rd RC now, mainly to incorporate Roman's >> suggestion >> > about fixing the maven version number from 0.2-SNAPSHOT => 1.0.0. Roman, >> > this is a source code release, we can't really deploy jars to maven >> since >> > we use munge to support different versions of Hadoop. Once we get rid >> of >> > munge, we'll be able to do this in the future. >> > > >> > > Release notes: >> > > http://people.apache.org/~aching/giraph-1.0.0-RC3/RELEASE_NOTES.html >> > > >> > > Release artifacts: >> > > http://people.apache.org/~aching/giraph-1.0.0-RC3/ >> > > >> > > Corresponding git tag: >> > > >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=giraph.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/release-1.0.0-RC3 >> > > >> > > Signing keys: >> > > http://people.apache.org/keys/group/giraph.asc >> > > >> > > The vote runs for 72 hours, until Thusday 4pm PST. >> > > >> > > Thanks for everyone's input! >> > > >> > > Avery >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Claudio Martella > [email protected] > -- Claudio Martella [email protected]
