My instinct is to immediately say yes but I don't think I should commit to that right now. I would be happy to be part of the discussion as to ideas, proposed methods to replace/remove it. But mentoring might spread me too thin this summer, as you know ;)
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Claudio Martella < claudio.marte...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, just to make sure we're on the same page on the munge topic and GSoC, > I started the bureaucracy for the project, but I won't be able to mentor > also that project. I plan to mentor the tinkerpop project, in case we get a > student. In case we get students for both projects, somebody would step in > for the munge one? > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Claudio Martella < > claudio.marte...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am afraid we're not going to get students this round. We really moved > at > > the last minute. On this topic, I sent a couple of emails to master > > students mailing lists to a couple of universities, but if you guys could > > also forward some recruiting emails to whom you think would be suitable, > it > > would probably help. Maybe also Sebastian can help here at TU Berlin? > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Eli Reisman <apache.mail...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> Thats a good point. It would represent a temporary solution. I'd like to > >> see us done with munge for all sorts of reasons if its possible. Might > be > >> a > >> difficult student project to complete cleanly though. Any other thoughts > >> on > >> this? > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Nitay Joffe <ni...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> > Just FYI our use of munge does not prevent us from doing binary jar > >> > release. We can use classifier to release multiple Giraph jars (each > >> built > >> > for different Hadoop). > >> > > >> > See e.g. > >> > > >> > > >> > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-deploy-plugin/examples/deploying-with-classifiers.html > >> > > >> > > >> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3092085/building-same-project-in-maven-with-different-artifactid-based-on-jdk-used > >> > > >> > So we would have like giraph-1.0.0-hadoop-0.20.203.0.jar, > >> > giraph-1.0.0-hadoop-2.0.0.jar, etc > >> > > >> > Seems to me like we don't know how long it will take to get rid of > >> munge. > >> > Perhaps we should do this as pulling in Giraph into Maven projects > would > >> > make it a lot easier for others to work with and lessen the barrier to > >> > entry? > >> > > >> > - Nitay > >> > > >> > On Apr 16, 2013, at 1:36 AM, Avery Ching <ach...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Okay, we're on our 3rd RC now, mainly to incorporate Roman's > >> suggestion > >> > about fixing the maven version number from 0.2-SNAPSHOT => 1.0.0. > Roman, > >> > this is a source code release, we can't really deploy jars to maven > >> since > >> > we use munge to support different versions of Hadoop. Once we get rid > >> of > >> > munge, we'll be able to do this in the future. > >> > > > >> > > Release notes: > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~aching/giraph-1.0.0-RC3/RELEASE_NOTES.html > >> > > > >> > > Release artifacts: > >> > > http://people.apache.org/~aching/giraph-1.0.0-RC3/ > >> > > > >> > > Corresponding git tag: > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=giraph.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/release-1.0.0-RC3 > >> > > > >> > > Signing keys: > >> > > http://people.apache.org/keys/group/giraph.asc > >> > > > >> > > The vote runs for 72 hours, until Thusday 4pm PST. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks for everyone's input! > >> > > > >> > > Avery > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Claudio Martella > > claudio.marte...@gmail.com > > > > > > -- > Claudio Martella > claudio.marte...@gmail.com >
