[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13899234#comment-13899234 ]
Pavan Kumar commented on GIRAPH-840: ------------------------------------ Eugune, My diff was based off of http://pastebin.com/uxtK6TPz There is a merge conflict in pom.xml So please apply against the above version then rebase. (or I just attached a non-conflicting patch in jira for convenience) Otherwise I thought the review will get messed up also showing changes from commits after the base commit (which I did not make, so confusing the reviewers; sorry first time here) > Upgrade to netty 4 > ------------------ > > Key: GIRAPH-840 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-840 > Project: Giraph > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Pavan Kumar > Assignee: Pavan Kumar > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > > Off late netty 4 has earned so much praise in the community. For example, > https://blog.twitter.com/2013/netty-4-at-twitter-reduced-gc-overhead > A switch to netty 4 enables a significant reduction in gc pressure and also > huge performance gains. I started working on this last Sunday and have a > patch that shows performance gains on the order of 15-25% (total execution > time) for some applications at Facebook. However, I only tested it with > hadoop_facebook. So there might be issues with SASL path. > I will release the patch today and want to open up a discussion if anyone is > using the secure feature anymore. If not we can just deprecate it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)